|

Back
to 2004 Archive
VOL. 5
NO. 10 OCTOBER 2004
|
In
this Issue
|
A
Word from Gregg Herman...
We
are pleased to introduce a new adoption column which will be authored by Attorneys
Stephen Hayes and Elizabeth Neary of The Schroeder Group, Waukesha Wisconsin.
Attorneys Hayes and Neary
are members of the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys and handle adoption,
foster care and surrogacy cases throughout the State of Wisconsin.
They can be reached at
(262) 798-8220 or via their Web site.
•••
One last time,
please be reminded that the ABA Family Law Section will be having its fall meeting
in Milwaukee from October 20 to 24, 2004. This is wonderful opportunity to showcase
our city and to meeting family law attorneys from around the country. For details
and registration information visit the ABA
Family Law Section Web Site.
|

On September 16, the supreme
court granted review in two family law cases:
Abbas v. Palmersheim, Nos. 02-3390 and 03-1267 (2004 WI App 126).
For our analysis of the
decision, please visit the July
2004 archived issue.
The second case was Chen v. Warner, No. 03-0288 (2004 WI App 112).
For our analysis, please
visit the June
2004 archived issue.
As we reported in a bulletin,
the District II Court of Appeals issued their opinion in Rumpff v. Rumpff, No.
03-2646 (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 8, 2004) (recommended for publication) affirming
the judgment of Judge Darryl W. Deets (Manitowoc County Cir. Ct.), concerning
child support, overnight equivalents and property division.
Full Opinion
(PDF)
Last month, we reported
to you on a court of appeals case recommended for publication, Lawrence v. Lawrence,
No. 03-1699 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 19, 2004). Our analysis of the holding, as published
in the Wisconsin Law Journal, is available on our
firm's Web site.

Decisions
Across the Nation
The following cases
are provided courtesy of Contributing Editor Laura W. Morgan, Family Law Consulting.
Laura is available for consultation, brief writing and research on family law
issues throughout the country. Please visit her website
or drop her an e-mail.
Holguin v. Flores
No. B168774
California Court of Appeals, Second District
September 15, 2004
Even if the state grants
the right to sue for wrongful death to the surviving member of a "domestic
partnership," i.e., a same-sex partnership, it may still constitutionally
deny the same right to the surviving member of an unmarried cohabiting couple
of opposite sex.
Full Opinion
(PDF)
Rogers v. McGahee
No. S04A0689
Georgia Supreme Court
September 14, 2004
A wife may seek to hold
a husband in contempt for failing to pay joint debts that were assigned to him
in the divorce proceeding, although the husband had those same debts discharged
in bankruptcy.
Full Opinion
(PDF)
Solomon v. Solomon
No. 116
Maryland Court of Appeals
September 13, 2004
Tax consequences may be
considered in establishing the amount of a marital property award as an "other
factor," under section 8-205(b)(11) of the Family Law Article, when they
are immediate and specific, or not speculative. Moreover, a country club membership
is not "property" to be divided, since it cannot be sold, transferred,
exchanged, redeemed, inherited, or liquidated.
Full Opinion
(PDF)
Ketterle v. Ketterle
No. 03-P-474
Massachusetts Court of Appeals
September 3, 2004
The trial court properly
awarded all of the husband's Nobel Prize money to the husband, and then awarded
the wife a larger portion of the remaining property since the Nobel Prize would
increase the husband's ability to acquire income and assets in the future.
Full Opinion
Williams v. Williams
120 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 64
Nevada Supreme Court
September 13, 2004
Nevada adopts the putative
spouse doctrine in annulment proceedings, holding that an individual whose marriage
is void due to a prior legal impediment is treated as a spouse with community
property rights in equitable division of property so long as the party seeking
equitable relief participated in the marriage ceremony with the good-faith belief
that the ceremony was legally valid.
Full Opinion
(PDF)
In re Estate of Davis
No. M2003-02614-COA-R3-CV
Tennessee Court of Appeals
September 2, 2004
A prenuptial agreement
entered into in Florida would not be recognized in Tennessee, even though it would
be valid in Florida, because it did not meet Tennessee's stricter requirements
of full and fair disclosure between the parties.
Full
Opinion (PDF)
State ex rel. Mitchell v.
Armstrong
No. W2003-01687-COA-R3-JV
Tennessee Court of Appeals
September 3, 2004
Parents may not privately
agree to suspend child support when the custodial parent is receiving public assistance.
Full
Opinion (PDF)

Family
Law Online
Airline
Chart for Unaccompanied Minors (PDF)
We thank Attorney
Rob V. Robertson of Austin, Texas, who posted a link to this site on the ABA Family
Law Section listserv.
Family
Law and Mental Health
The following
is provided courtesy of Contributing Editor Christine Harness, Phd. Dr. Harness
can be reached at (414) 961-3208:
"Reconceptualizing
Custody"
A A recent
article in the September 2004 issue of the American Psychological Association's
Monitor on Psychology entitled "Reconceptualizing Custody" addresses
an emerging service for families and courts designed to ease litigious divorce's
impact on children. For the full article contact the APA at 1-800-374-2721, ext.
5510 or you can access
it online.

Business
Valuations
The following is provided
by Contributing Editor Timothy P. Muehler, JD, CPA/ABV, CVA, Clifton Gunderson
LLP, Certified Public Accountantsy. You can reach Tim via
e-mail.
Betsy T. Turner, Executrix of
the Estate of
Theodore Thompson, Deceased v. Commissioner
No. 03-3173
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
September 1, 2004
The case affirmed a tax
court decision to include undiscounted partnership assets in an estate under Sec.
2036(a). The Court of Appeals discussed the partnership operations and determined
that it lacked a "valid, functioning business enterprise".
Decision Summary

Family
Law Mediation
The following is provided
courtesy of Contributing Editor Kathleen Baird, a family law attorney and mediator
in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. She can be reached via
e-mail.
Did You Know?
1. Marital conflict, poor
communication, non-mutuality in the decision to divorce and strained cooperation
do not appear to act as barriers to selecting mediation.
2. Men are significantly
more positive about beginning the mediation process than women.
3. Those who choose mediation
report significantly higher levels of divorce-related depression, guilt and stress
than those who do not choose mediation.
4. One of the factors that
best predict successful mediation is the mediator's ability to provide insights
into the parties' feelings and those of their children,
5. Mediators establish
their impartiality to each party by diffusing negative comments of one party toward
another.
6. Mediation appears to
have very little ability to alter basic relationship patterns between divorcing
couples.
7. Voluntary participation
in mediation does not appear to produce higher settlement rates than mandated
participation in mediation.
8. Users find that mediation
identifies the real issues in a dispute.
9. Of those who reached
agreement in mediation, two-thirds of both men and women agreed that spousal support
and property division were fair.
10. Women report that the
mediation process helped them assume more responsibility in managing their personal
affairs than did men, and women had greater confidence in their ability to stand
up for themselves as a result of the process.
These and more research
facts can be found in Forrest S. Mosten's article,
"Family Mediation: Research Facts".

Adoption
Following
is provided courtesy of Contributing Editors Stephen Hayes and Elizabeth Neary
of The Schroeder Group, Waukesha Wisconsin. Attorneys Hayes and Neary are members
of the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys and handle adoption, foster care
and surrogacy cases throughout the State of Wisconsin. They can be reached at
(262) 798-8220 and via their Web Site.
Several educational
opportunities for lawyers and non lawyers are on the docket in the next several
weeks.
On September
28-29 at 7 pm at the First Congregational Church in Wauwatosa, Resolve is sponsoring
programs for non lawyers on infertility and adoption issues. The cost is nominal.
For more information, visit Resolve's Web site.
On October
14 from 1-5 and October 15 9-5:30, there is a program for adoption professionals
who work with Agency Adoptions at the Hampton Inn and Suites, Convention Center,
New Orleans. Cost is $240. For more information contact Steve Hayes via
e-mail or send a general e-mail
inquiry.
On November
6 from 8-1 at the Tommy Thompson Youth Center at State Fair Park, there is a program
for those interested in adopting. The cost is free or nominal. For more information
visit the Adoption Resources of Wisconsin Web
site.
We are looking
for a few good men and women! We have been coordinating a pro bono program for
the last several years in which family law attorneys agree to handle one uncontested,
default divorce. The client is a foster mother who is seeking to adopt her foster
child or children but cannot do so until she has obtained a divorce from her husband
(usually someone she has been separated from for many years). You are not expected
to be out of pocket anything. Your reward is knowing that you have helped a child
gain a legally permanent family. If you would be willing to help please
email Steve Hayes and give me your phone number, address and email address.
We currently have 3 cases awaiting volunteers.

Our Contributing
Editors
Atty. Kathy
Baird (Mediation)
CPA Scott Franklin. Kohler & Franklin, Milwaukee (Tax Tips)
Prof. Charles Kindregan, Suffolk University Law School
Dr. Christine Harness, Ph.D., Milwaukee (Mental Health)
Atty. Laura Morgan, Family Law Consulting, Charlottesville, VA (Family Law Cases)
CPA Timothy P. Muehler, Clifton Gunderson LLP
Dr. Sanford Portnoy, Boston, MA (Mental Health)
CPA Everett Stone (Taxes and business valuations)
Scott J. Wildman, CPA/ABV, CVA of V/B Business Valuations, Inc.
Atty. William Brown (Employee Benefits)
Atty. Stephen Hayes (Adoption)
Atty. Elizabeth Neary (Adoption)
We thank
them for their contributions!
|
Our Firm | Meet
Our Attorneys | Practice Areas
| Articles & Resources |
| FamLaw Update e-Mail | Contact
& Directions | Back to Main |
©
2009, Loeb & Herman, S.C.
Suite 1725 - Chase Tower
111 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202-4868
414.272.5632 | Fax 414.272.7918
|