
Guardians
ad Litem Essential in Family Court
By Gregg
Herman
Wisconsin Opinions
April 29, 1999
The
importance of the GAL's role in family court cannot be overstated. The
court, knowing that the GAL is entrusted to do an appropriate investigation,
relies heavily on the GAL's recommendation. A good GAL will settle most,
if not all, custody and placement disputes. By settling these disputes,
the harm to the child is, at worst, minimized and sometimes avoided
altogether.
Perhaps
as a result of the critical importance of the role, the GAL takes a
lot of fire. While at the beginning of the case both sides try hard
to make the GAL believe in the righteousness of his/her cause, by the
end both sides typically end up disappointed that the GAL did not see
the issues their way.
Of
course, the disenchantment with the GAL arises from more than frustration
with the legal system. Not all GALs perform appropriate investigations.
Not all GALs truly understand child-related issues. As with any other
role, not all GALs are diligent, insightful or motivated.
As
a result, there are constant efforts to eliminate GALs in family court.
On April 20, 1999, a public hearing was conducted on SB 107, the latest
effort to eliminate GALs. The legislature heard numerous anecdotes of
allegedly neglectful GAL performance. They did not hear, of course,
of the far more instances where the GAL role was central to protecting
the interests of the children. Parties whose children benefited from
the GAL do not complain. And, of course, the children themselves have
no advocacy group to speak on their behalf.
Further,
if the GAL is eliminated, who speaks up for the child? The parents?
They each have their own interests. The court? The court does not have
the resources to conduct an investigation. Social workers? Get real
- we don't have any in Milwaukee County. Truth is, without the GAL,
the children are left naked and abandoned, at the end of a long branch
with no safety net.
This
is not to say that much can be done to improve GAL performance. The
State Bar Family Law Section has adopted recommended standards of practice
for GALs (these can be downloaded for free from the Family Law Section
page at the State Bar website, www.wisbar.org). Effective July 1, 1999,
the supreme court, which regulates GALs through its rule making procedures,
will require that GALs in family court have taken approved training
courses prior to accepting appointments. The Wisconsin Chapter of the
American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and the State Bar of Wisconsin
are cosponsoring a GAL training course on May 20 and 21 at the Country
Inn in Pewaukee, with video replay throughout the state on June 16 and
June 17 , 1999.
There
is more than can still be done to improve GAL performance. Counties
need to understand that they are not truly "saving" the taxpayers money
by paying GALs starvation wages. By doing so, many experienced attorneys
refuse to take such appointments. Many custody and placement cases involve
issues of such complexity that there is no substitute for experience
to effectively and efficiently perform the role of GAL.
This
is not to say that our custody and placement laws are perfect. But,
neither is life. And, little in life is more imperfect than parenting.
Parenting, a role for which there is no law requiring training or licensing,
is incredibly complex and difficult. Custody cases are no less complex
and difficult. To treat them by application of a ritualistic formula
does children no good.
Legislators
like simplistic solutions. They allow politicians to claim they are
"solving problems." Not in this case. Custody problems cannot be "solved."
They have been with us forever and will be with us forever.
The
best "solution" any state has come up with is to empower the court with
wide discretion to consider the complex, individual facts in each case
and provide the court with the resources to do so. SB 107 promotes exactly
the opposite.
Back
to Herman Article Archive